home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.compusult.nf.ca!mworden
- From: mworden@public.compusult.nf.ca (Mark Worden)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics
- Subject: fbl or CPUBlit?
- Date: 19 Apr 1996 17:14:12 GMT
- Organization: Compusult Limited - Public Access Unix
- Message-ID: <4l8hl5$qh7@hobbes.compusult.nf.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: public.compusult.nf.ca
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Can anyone tell me which is better to use, fbl or CPUBlit for speeding up
- the Amiga's display (supposedly)? I have an A3000/030/25MHz, and I'm
- wondering if either of these programs can pose any kind of problem,
- perhaps causing the system to crash at any time, etc.
-
- Do they actually make any difference? I've tried each one, and I didn't
- really notice anything...except my machine seemed to crash more often,
- but it may have been something else causing that.
-
- Thanks.
-
- --
- / Mark Worden mworden@public.compusult.nf.ca \
- | St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Member of TEAM AMIGA |
- | "The smallest good deed is greater than the best good intention." |
- \ "John Doe: generic tractor the John Deere Co. is coming out with." /
-